

- Video card for mac for 2 displays 1080p#
- Video card for mac for 2 displays full#
- Video card for mac for 2 displays Pc#
Still, the level of detail in its OSD is staggering. Unfortunately, since it's the most expensive monitor of the group, most of you (also like me) will have a difficult time justifying its price. If details are something that excite and inspire you, then you're a lot like me, and the NEC will likely appeal to your sensibilities. The NEC thinks pretty highly of itself and needs to be checked from time to time.


The 850D rivals the U2711 (which I'll cover below) in OSD options, and while it has comparatively few connections, the utilitarian power brick cubbyhole is a clever feature. That doesn't, however, mean it has nothing to offer beyond its looks. With the thinnest panel and slickest design, the S27A850D handily wins the best-dressed award.
Video card for mac for 2 displays full#
Read the full review.Įrgonomically, with all the twists and turns it offers, the 850D is like the monitor version of an episode of "24." There's even a thinly veiled reference in the video. This is extremely annoying, but ultimately, will only affect a very small percentage of owners. Also, a butter knife or an old DVD would suffice.
Video card for mac for 2 displays Pc#
Because of a thoughtless design decision, once you connect to a PC via the DisplayPort, you do not disconnect, ever, unless you possess razor-thin fingers or a screwdriver. Well, there is that problem with the DisplayPort. Honestly, there's not much more to say about it. Honestly, of the people even remotely interested in buying a monitor, only a small percentage will ever pay more than $500 for one, let alone $1,000 (or in this case, $1,200).īut the S27B970 produces amazingly sharp images, looks like something from the future, and allows you adjust the colors, brightness, and contrast to your heart's content. The Samsung SyncMaster S27B970 earns its place on this list based on its performance, aesthetic quality, and picture customization options. Read the full review.ĭeath and rebirth have absolutely nothing to do with this monitor. Thankfully, the Thunderbolt support, built-in Ethernet, USB ports, FireWire ports, and its simple Mac compatibility also make it the best choice for MacBook owners. If you're a Mac user who doesn't own a 27-inch iMac and don't want to be left out of the face-melting party (and you don't), this is your best choice. Thanks to their (current) max resolution of 1,920x1,080 pixels, movies don't benefit from 2,560x1,440 as much as games do. It features the HP ZR2740W, which didn't make the Top 5, but for those on a budget, it's the one to get. Also, check out the video above for just a taste of the power you're not ready for. Keep reading for details on the easiest way to ruin the console experience you're currently settling for.
Video card for mac for 2 displays 1080p#
The effect of seeing a modern game running at 2,560x1,440 pixels is.well, let's just say you won't want to settle for anything less, including the 50-inch 1080p HDTV your console is currently connected to. Just remember, you'll need an equally capable graphics card to really take advantage. Most modern games support the resolution and look stunning while doing so. However, as much as the impressive resolution benefits all aspects of computing, it is in games that it provides a particular advantage. If you've never seen a 27-inch monitor running at 2,560x1,440-pixel resolution, then you've yet to be touched by a particularly affecting higher power.Īlso referred to as "extreme definition" or "XD," this branch of higher-tier monitors will melt your face and not look back. While most 27-inch monitors you'll find at your local Best Buy sport the perfectly capable resolution of 1,920x1,080 pixels, there's a growing contingent of monitor enthusiasts, like myself, who understand the real reason for the existence of 27-inch displays.
